(b) Only two statements are correct (1st and 2nd)
Article 72 of the Constitution empowers the President of India to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of an offence. This includes cases where the sentence is death, provided it involves the executive power of the Union.
Article 161 empowers the Governor to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute sentences in cases related to State laws. However, unlike the President, the Governor cannot grant pardons in cases of death sentences. This power is confined to the President.
While the President has the power to grant pardons, it is not exclusive in the sense that it cannot be overruled by a Governor. Governors have separate powers under Article 161, and the President’s powers are more extensive, particularly regarding death sentences, but they do not override the Governor’s powers in matters related to State crimes. (3rd statement is incorrect)

(c) Only three statements are correct
The IBC was indeed enacted in 2016 to consolidate and amend all existing insolvency laws in India.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) is the adjudicating authority for insolvency resolution of companies and limited liability partnerships under the IBC.
While the IBC provides a time-bound process for resolving insolvency, the maximum period for the completion of the resolution process is 330 days, including any extensions and legal proceedings. (3rd statement is incorrect)
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is responsible for the implementation of the IBC.
Cross-border insolvency typically occurs when a debtor has operations or creditors in multiple countries, and there is a need for coordination and cooperation among different courts and stakeholders to achieve an efficient and fair resolution.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, 1997, is a widely accepted legal framework to deal with cross-border insolvency issues.

(d) All four
The Kakatiya Dynasty was a South Indian Telugu dynasty that ruled most of eastern Deccan region in present-day India between 12th and 14th centuries. Early Kakatiya rulers served as feudatories to Rashtrakutas and Western Chalukyas for more than two centuries. They assumed sovereignty under Prataparudra I in 1163 CE by suppressing other Chalukya subordinates in the Telangana region.
Marco Polo, who visited India around 1289–1293, made note of Rudrama Devi’s rule and nature in flattering terms.
The Kakatiya polity was based on the monarchical system. The Kakatiya ruler was the pivot of the entire administrative structure, yet he was not an absolute autocrat.
Generally, in the process of succession, they followed the law of primogeniture (is a law of inheritance that gives the firstborn child the right to inherit the deceased’s property, wealth, and/or title) and as already referred; a woman coming to the throne was a remarkable exception.

(b) 2 Only
The La Pérouse multilateral exercise is indeed a biennial naval exercise that involves countries from the Indo-Pacific region. The focus is on enhancing maritime cooperation, security, and interoperability between the navies of participating countries.
The first La Pérouse exercise was held in 2019, not 2020. Additionally, the exercise is not exclusively organized by the Indian Navy. The French Navy plays a key role, and multiple countries participate, including Australia, Japan, and the United States. (2nd statement is incorrect)

(b) Facilitate rural land ownership through property titles.
The SVAMITVA (Survey of Villages and Mapping with Improvised Technology in Village Areas) Scheme aims to provide clear title deeds to property owners in rural areas, thereby facilitating rural land ownership and enabling better access to credit and other government schemes.